Is radiocarbon dating reliable
They need a way to date artifacts further than 5,000 to 6,000 years ago so they can prove their false theory "true"!If no dating system is created, evolution will forever be stuck in the realm of hypothesis.Even with such manipulation, the scientists still can't remove all the discrepancies. It is under this pretense that scientists take up the false hypothesis of evolution as their religion, the foundation of their knowledge.That is what the Bible terms "the oppositions of science falsely so called" (1 Timothy ).
But they still have to verify their calibrations with samples of known dates. Radiocarbon dates can only be trusted up until the record left by trees can back them up. Doesn't that give accurate dates of "prehistoric" civilizations?Carbon dating is the ultimate benchmark of the evolutionary dating world.But the new data, combined with what Reimer calls a 'real sense of necessity' among team members to resolve the debates, won the day" (January 15)."Fancy statistical treatments" that didn't even resolve all of the discrepancies?