The american way of war weigley online dating

They provide a brief excursus on pre-contact Native American warfare, but other than that, there is no real nod here or elsewhere to the non-Anglo experience, most notably the Spanish (or Indians) of the Southwest.Although in many ways this is perfectly understandable, it is regrettable in that it does not keep up with the trends in the broader field of American history to treat the continent as a more contiguous whole, whether referring to the Comanche Empire of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Spanish presidio system, or the spread of smallpox around the continent in the eighteenth century. Pershing to wear down the German army in 1918, and by the U. Army Air Force to pulverize all the major cities of Germany and Japan in 1944-45. armies composed of citizen-soldiers suffered and inflicted massive casualties.

American use of force was not always about annihilation.They perhaps skate too briefly through the influence of nuclear weapons on U. force development and strategy during the Cold War, but they do bring their narrative up into the presidency of Barack Obama and the killing of Osama bin Laden.The authors are well aware of trends in military history to include far more than narrations of battles and campaigns, and each chapter is replete with context, both political and social.Annihilation became the default answer as well as the underlying assumption behind weapons procurement programs and doctrinal production.None of those, Weigley argued, served the United States well in Vietnam.

Leave a Reply